Anatomical fresco of the face and throat beside an early waveform recorder
Wega Labs

Wega Labs · The destination

Thought to text.

Thought to text is the destination. The engineering path runs through selection, silent speech, and non-invasive neural control. We are building the tractable steps now.

ProgrammeActive research · Stage 01

Definitions / 01

Three very different things get called the same name.

Most confusion about this field comes from collapsing three separate technologies into one phrase. They differ by orders of magnitude in bandwidth, in invasiveness, and in how close they are to being a product a person could own.

Surface EMG is the closest consumer path today; its signal is the neuromuscular act of speech.

Signal bands / 02

What each band can actually do.

Separating the three bands by bandwidth, invasiveness, and product readiness makes the engineering path clear.

01

Silent speech · surface EMGNear term

Sub-vocal articulation produces measurable muscle activity in the jaw, throat, and face even when no sound is made. This is the closest band to a consumer path today. Its signal is the neuromuscular act of speech, which defines the near-term product boundary.

02

Non-invasive neural · EEG / MEGResearch

Published work recovers coarse semantic categories and, under fMRI, approximate continuous meaning. Bandwidth is low, sessions are long, and per-subject training is heavy. Its present value is as a research signal; interface-grade bandwidth remains the engineering target.

03

Implanted electrodesClinical frontier

Implanted arrays in clinical populations produce the highest-bandwidth results in the literature. They define the frontier the field measures against; our programme concentrates on non-invasive systems.

State of the art / 03

Published results, as of August 2026.

Every figure below is reproduced from its citation and checked against it. Results from other teams remain attributed at the row.

Brain2Qwerty

Meta · MEG-based decoding
32%character error rate · 19% for the best participant

Requires a multi-tonne magnetoencephalography machine in a magnetically shielded room — and the participant is physically typing on a QWERTY keyboard. It decodes motor commands to the fingers, not inner speech.

The same architecture on EEG

wearable-compatible sensing
67%character error rate

Two of every three characters wrong. This is the number that matters for anything you could actually wear, and it is not close to usable.

AlterEgo

sEMG subvocalisation · MIT, IUI 2018
92%median word accuracy

Genuinely the closest thing to silent speech. Constrained vocabularies, no announced price, no ship date, and the current build still tethers to external processing.

Meta Neural Band

wrist sEMG · shipping today
Shipshandwriting → text

It works and you can buy it. But it is bundle-locked to one ecosystem with no third-party SDK, so nothing independent can be built on it.

Sources · Meta, Brain-to-Text Decoding: A Non-invasive Approach via Typing (arXiv 2502.17480) · Kapur et al., AlterEgo (IUI 2018) · Meta Quest engineering blog, CES 2026. Figures are reproduced as published and are not measurements of our own systems.

The finding the field under-reports / 04

A meaningful share of demonstrated mind control is clenching.

The artifactual component of the EEG signal is significantly more informative than brain activity with respect to classification accuracy — consistent across different feature extraction methods and classification pipelines.Artifacts in EEG-Based BCI Therapies: Friend or Foe? · Sensors 22(1):96

When researchers separated artifact components from brain-signal components in EEG recordings, the artifacts — jaw, eye and neck muscle activity — were consistently more predictive of intended movement than the brain signal was.

Movement-related artifacts are not random noise. They contaminate the signal of interest in a predictable way, which makes them more useful to an automated classifier, not less. Most published BCI work does not report whether it controlled for this.

The paper draws the distinction that matters: informative artifacts are a helpful friend in communication applications, and a serious foe when the goal is estimating a physiological brain state. A decoder optimised purely for accuracy will happily select for the clench.

We consider this the single most important fact for anyone entering this field, ourselves included. It is why one of our five public commitments is an artifact control.

Prior art / 05

What the best shipped demonstration actually does.

The most concrete public prototype of this idea is ThinkVoice, built at the Grokathon. It deserves credit, and it deserves an accurate description.

Someone speaks. A language model generates candidate replies as on-screen chips. The user selects one by tapping or with a blink, nod, or head shake through an optional head-worn sensing device or the phone’s on-device face camera. A cloned voice says the chosen line aloud.

That is roughly 1.6 bits of human intent per utterance. The model supplies everything else. Its current public page describes invite-only TestFlight software for iPhone and Apple Watch, not a public App Store release, and does not establish neural thought decoding. It demonstrates the selection architecture cleanly.

Plate V — attenuation between intent and executionA band narrowing across five stages — intent, language, motor plan, keystrokes, tokens — losing simultaneity, precision, time, and context at each translation, and arriving as a serial string of roughly fifty bits.01 · INTENTformed, parallel, complete02 · LANGUAGEserialised into words03 · MOTOR PLANwords routed to hands04 · KEYSTROKESone character at a time05 · TOKENSwhat the machine receives− simultaneityParallel intent becomes a queue.− precisionThe word chosen is rarely the word meant.− timeYour hands are the slow part.− contextIt receives the string, not the reason.≈50 bitsPLATE VATTENUATION BETWEEN INTENT AND EXECUTIONThe width of the band is the fraction of the original intent still intact. Nothing in this drawing is a model limitation.

Plate VI / 06

The same instruction, priced four ways.

01Type49 characters

makedarkthecheckoutscreen,thesecondvariant

bits emitted54
02Speakthe same sentence, no hands

makedarkthecheckoutscreen,thesecondvariant

bits emitted54
03Select from candidates4 choices of four

select → screen_03 · select → dark · confirm

bits emitted8
04Attend, then select2 choices of four

attend → screen_03 · select → dark

bits emitted4
Plate VI Authoring rows are costed at Shannon’s ≈1.1 bits per character of printed English. Selection rows are exact: log₂(4) = 2 bits per choice. Grey is pointing, ink is instruction, and the ruled band is what another modality carried instead.

Research standard / 07

The evidence standard for every result we publish.

01

We describe selection as selection.

We name the signal, input method, and model contribution.

02

Every accuracy figure includes information rate.

We report target count and time per selection beside accuracy.

03

Artifact controls ship with every neural result.

We test every neural result against a muscular explanation. Mixed signals remain labelled as mixed.

04

Published results stay attributed.

Prior results keep their citation, apparatus, participants, and conditions.

05

Failed gates remain part of the record.

We publish each gate, result, and dataset.

Programme / 08

Selection is the first rung toward thought to text.

Thought to text is the destination and the reason this lab exists. The programme advances through measurable layers of bandwidth, control, and product readiness.

The rung a person can actually use today is selection — a handful of bits, aimed at a model that supplies the rest. That is where our engineering is, and the counter on the front page reports exactly what it costs.

Where the work is now

Stage 01 begins with the interaction.

The interaction earns its place before neural hardware enters the loop. A laptop camera and a live information counter answer that question first.